Barely There CustomFlex Fit™ Boyshort

Style #19447
Price:  $10.00
sale:  $8.99
You Save: $1.01
Roll On to Zoom In

Barely There CustomFlex Fit™ Boyshort

Style #19447
No lines. No scratchy seams. No itchy tag. Nothing but blissful softness. That's the beauty of these Barely There Boy Shorts.
  • Silky premium microfiber soothes and pampers your skin.
  • A hint of knit-in stretch assures flawless fit and freedom.
  • Seamless styling helps eliminate chafing.
  • Non-elastic boy legs add extra comfort--and look cute!
  • Wide knit-in waist.
  • The same boy short panty as Barely There retail style 2855.
More Details +
Imported
Nylon/spandex microfiber
Watch Video

4 for $22

Regular Price
$10.00
Sale Price
$8.99
You Save
$1.01
Select Color
Select Size
S
M
L
XL
Select Quantity
Size:
Color:
Quantity:
ea.
We guarantee to replace your purchase or refund your money for any reason.
Rated 2.8 out of 5 by 10 reviewers.
Rated 3 out of 5 by There has to be better out there... Purchased 3 pairs; black/white polka dot, the pink strips, and the soft taupe leopard. I am not very big, but these don't even begin to cover my back side. I purchased one size larger than my regular size in these, based on some of the other review feedback. If I pull the legs down to cover my cheeks, then the waist is below my hips and showing crack; and visa versa. They are also terribly thin. They work o.k. under pantyhose (because they hold them in place...), but not so good with pants or jeans. For the price per pair, I REALLY expected much more in terms of fit, comfort, and quality. November 19, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5 by Cut way too skimpy I ordered this exact product -- style 2855-- large -- three months ago and the fit was perfect. So, I reordered and the current version--"The same boy short panty as Barely There retail style 2855" --large. It is 1 inch shorter on the sides. So they slide down during the day. I'm always having to hitch them up--and I'm between medium & large a 6-7. Obviously, no quality control. But picture shows what the fit should be. February 18, 2014
<<prev 2 3